Proof the Australian Governmet is unlawful

Living Food

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Location
USA
Actually it's a corporation, registered with the Securities Exchange Commission in Washington DC!

See here: "Company Name: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA"

Two governments
Case Studies

Watch this 52 minute documentary exposing the truth of the Australian "government", it will open your eyes to what's really going on. There's real laws and pretend laws, and most of the laws we blindly accept are in fact pretend laws created by a corporation acting as de facto government, rather then by the de jure government. Also keep in mind that almost every time you see names in CAPITAL LETTERS then it is the name of a corporation - that applies to your birth certificate too, but that's a whole other story. Now look at the names of just about every government agency on each of their seals...capital letters.That's not a government, it's a corporation! You've been conned!


I know this sounds crazy, but it's true. At least suspend judgement until you read the links and watch the documentary, and you will most likely have changed your mind. Truth is far stranger then fiction - and this is only mild truth, I don't talk about the really crazy stuff online.

What the FUQ - Frequently Unanswered Questions of the "Australian Government" - click here to watch the documentary. For some reason I couldn't embed it in the post.

I'm certain this applies to the US and the other major goverments as well, but I'd need to do more research first to have conclusive proof.
 

Living Food

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Location
USA
Original Poster
The Great Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia - legitimate government:



The corporate logo of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA - corporation masquerading as government:



Which seal are the government agencies and courts using, I wonder?











They all use the corporate logo (kangaroo and emu), not the actual Great Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia (lion and unicorn).
 

tick

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Congratulations, you have figured out that all governments are really just corporations designed to earn their fat cat CEOs a nice big paycheck at the expense of the less fortunate...

I am actually surprised that this hasn't been brought to light sooner.

Although this fits in perfectly with that new movie (remake but it's "new") "Total Recall" There was really only one "recognized" government, and the other one was just a "colony" which was really just a corporation with "workers" and not "citizens".

So... Thanks for posting the proof, maybe now more people will finally realize what has been sitting right in front of them for so many years. Our world is slowly slipping into the abyss, and we don't have governments, we have corporate entities leading the way.

We don't have world leaders, we have bankers. We don't have Congress, we have board of directors, which aren't interested in the needs of the people, they are just interested in the "bottom line".

As one popular video game put it... "Happiness is shopping for the corporation.. Don't you want to be happy?" :shock:

Welcome to planet earth, we hope you enjoy your stay. We are a "reality" amusement park. Please ignore the man in the big chair, and the men behind the purple curtain...

Is anyone going to save us? Anyone?

No... "No one's gonna save us now... Do you hear us... We're going down... In a spiral to the ground...."

http://youtu.be/y5ZgE3C4dLk
 

Living Food

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Location
USA
Original Poster
Congratulations, you have figured out that all governments are really just corporations designed to earn their fat cat CEOs a nice big paycheck at the expense of the less fortunate...
Oh, I've known that for a while - now I have the proof, though.

It's up to us to save ourselves. The world will improve considerably in the years ahead, even thought things may get worse before they get better. Hold on to your seatbelts, we're in for a bumpy ride!

The universe operates in cycles, and there is a increase in conciousness ahead. The PTB will clamp down even harder to prevent it, but ultimately we will prevail - IF everyone goes out and starts doing something to make it happen...starting now.

"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem."
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
 

tick

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Very good and apt quotes... I have but one question.. Just HOW are we supposed to go about making a change? What actions do we take to help make a difference?

THOSE are the tough questions. I think there are more and more people who are "awake" now, but there isn't any real clear direction, or way which is outlined on how we can go about instituting a change. People know there needs to be a change, but they have no idea what course to take to help get it started.. This leads to an increase frustration level.. I have sensed it a lot..

people are getting more and more frustrated.. i'm afraid that eventually what is going to happen is that it's going to erupt in violence, and I really hope we can do something and impose those changes without needing to kill a billion people for it... :shock:
 

limitme

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
every government is unlawful. government can only exist by stealing.
Jesus and every other enlightened text tells us that stealing is wrong.
 

Mad Scientest

New member
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Location
Illinois
[FONT=&quot]Originally it was “The constitution of the [/FONT][FONT=&quot]United States[/FONT][FONT=&quot]”[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Now it is;[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“THE CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES”[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]to the average person that may not look like a big deal, but to a lawyer the all capital letters screams this is a corporation![/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]What can be done about it? Well a group of people got together recently and filed international paperwork stating we are declaring our independence and sovereign rights from “the corporation” and have reinstated our original constitution. The paperwork is done and it re-declared our basic rights and freedoms, as of the moment no physical action has taken place. But it is already to go and waiting for the right moment. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Another way of restrain government is “nullification” with it a state simply says we will not follow that law. Take obamacare for an example, a state can simple chose to ignore it if it so wishes. Now if the government tries to send in federal “officials” to enforce “the law” the local sheriff can arrest them and throw them in jail. Your local sheriff is the highest law enforcement person for your area and no one can over rule him except the citizens who voted him in to office. How many are aware of that?. Does your sheriff even know it?:shock:[/FONT]
 

revzen

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Location
England
Same in the UK! Governments operating as companies, police forces too! Councils also.

We are plastic pieces in a world wide game of monopoly - and "they" always win!

What can we do? Spread the word. Leave leaflets on the bus etc. But, this will take forever!

A mass awakening is required. The process is already under way, soon it be of tidal wave proportions and conclude in the biggest tsunami of conssciouness ever seen.

Soon my friends, soon. The awakening of Consciousness will give birth to a New Way where all sentient beings will Live from the Heart.

Some video presentations which keep in line with the OP.

ThinkFree Presents - The Magnificent Deception - Robert Menard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohiyO-IcqG8

Robert Menard - Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception (Entire)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eabYMa0Ht40&feature=relmfu

Freeman Lectures - Robert Menard, Luke Denis - On Money
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3h6-_qhiTnc&feature=related
 

Solstice Goat

Frater Aegagrus
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Location
Seattle, WA
Awesome thread!!

On 'Total Recall' ; Make sure to read more Phillip K. Dick, Sixth Day, Minority Report, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, A Scanner Darkly.
 

Living Food

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Location
USA
Original Poster
I noticed my first link didn't work, so here it is - COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

I've found around 3 dozen "governments" registered with the SEC, I'll post them all here later w/links.

Also, proof that the kangaroo + emu symbol isn't the Great Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia: it's been patented by the company COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. Actually there are about half a dozen patents for slight variations on that symbol too.
 

Living Food

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Location
USA
Original Poster
Here's another good website, the Dun & Bradstreet database - most comprehensive database on businesses in the world.

Now, lots of people know the FEDERAL RESERVE is a corporation, but how many people would be surprised to see these well-known "government agencies" listed as corporations?

The FBI
FEMA
The CIA
The DEA
The NSA

And every other member of the alphabet soup agencies. If you click on the links to some of the "agencies" I listed say "Also traded as..." What more evidence could you possibly need?

For example, the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION says "Also Traded as FBI". They must think we're really dumb to put that in plain sight.
 

Living Food

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Location
USA
Original Poster
Back to Australia for a moment - I can prove that the kangaroo + emu symbol is a corporate logo and not the original Great Seal of The Commonwealth of Australia, because it is patented by the company COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. Actually there are around a half-dozen different kangaroo + emu logos patented by the COMMONWEALTH, each with slight variations.

Very clever using similar names and counting on the people to automatically assume they're dealing with the legitimate government, but a little research and their house of cards starts to collapse. I'm going to show this to lots of people, it's time the word got out.
 

Living Food

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Location
USA
Original Poster
Now this is interesting; we've got two companies listed as South Africa - REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA and GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRCA...and the second one only has one filing, which looks like a merger agreement between GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA and TELKOM SA LTD. The latter is a communications company that is partly owned by the state, which is probably what that document is about. I wonder why it was filed by a different company then the main REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, though? Curious.

For the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, the mailing address is the NATIONAL TREASURY, whereas for the GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA it is the MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS. Makes me think that the former created the latter solely for the purpose of buying shares in the communications company, or maybe the the latter was created as a sort of joint company between the communications company and the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA? I'm sure there's a reason buried somewhere in the statues and acts (note, not laws) that govern how companies operate?

Also interesting is how the CITY OF NAPLES is listed as a separate company then the REPUBLIC OF ITALY. Maybe it's a separate city-state like DC, the Inner City of London and the Vatican?
 

revzen

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Location
England
Not a big John Harris fan, but he put some decent information out there. Here's one of his presentations, which he also refers to Dunn & Bradstreet.

The proof is their but even with proof many people still trust the government:shock:

Also from the UK is Veronica of the Chapman Family, who is an excellent source of information. Sadly some people ridicule Veronica because of her gender, she is transgender. I've met Veronica and she's a great lady who is bloody sharp!!!

BUT always do your own research! What these brave individuals have done is to show us that we are really prisoners to a deeply corrupt system. Many people are waking up, so all is far from lost!

People I recommend are:-

Rob Menard
Dean Clifford
Veronica of the Chapman Family

The videos:-

JOHN HARRIS : It's an Illusion | 2009 (FULL VERSION)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYJzXkcJgEU

VERONICA CHAPMAN FMOTL, KENT FREEDOM MOVEMENT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wsqhz6nttck
 

tick

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Wow... So our world really is a bunch of corporations... Interesting that some "communist" countries are traded publicly?

What the heck is up with that? I thought under communism, corporate entities really couldn't exist? Or well, not in the traditional sense anyway...
 

revzen

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Location
England
Wow... So our world really is a bunch of corporations... Interesting that some "communist" countries are traded publicly?

What the heck is up with that? I thought under communism, corporate entities really couldn't exist? Or well, not in the traditional sense anyway...
Plenty of wealthy communists about!
 

Living Food

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Location
USA
Original Poster
Interesting that some "communist" countries are traded publicly?

What the heck is up with that?
Everything we're taught is a lie; all world conflict is intentionally orchestrated to keep the masses afraid and occupied and every gov and terrorist group answers to the same people.

Now isn't this interesting: The GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, "Also Traded as the OFFICE OF TAX & REVENUE". Now you know what their real purpose is, don't you?
 

tick

New member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Everything we're taught is a lie; all world conflict is intentionally orchestrated to keep the masses afraid and occupied and every gov and terrorist group answers to the same people.

Now isn't this interesting: The GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, "Also Traded as the OFFICE OF TAX & REVENUE". Now you know what their real purpose is, don't you?
We certainly do live in some "interesting times"..

Any idea WHEN this happened? When dd world governments become corporations?

When did citizens become "products"? When did laws become "policies"... Oh wait... Foreign POLICY.... hmmmm....

I guess they always have been corporations? When the hell did this slip by everyone though? That's just scary..

:shock:
 

revzen

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Location
England
when our parents complete our Birth Certificate they are signing ownership over to the government! :shock:

snippet:-

It all started when your parents had a happy event and you entered the world. You don't know exactly when that was, because you were not aware of the days of the week, the months of the year or even what year it was.

Even after some months had gone by, you still were not aware of these things, but by that time, your strawman had already been created and it was being used to make some very unscrupulous people rich. None of this was your fault. It happened because your parents were fooled into thinking that they needed to register your birth and get a birth certificate for you. So, they APPLIED for a birth certificate, not understanding what would happen when they did. Well then, what did happen? According to the Local Authority:

1. They lost ownership of their baby (you).
2. They allowed a strawman to be created.


This is not something which they can be blamed for, as nobody told them it would, or even could, happen. Nor did anybody tell them what a strawman is or how it can be used against their baby. In actual fact, the “registration” is a contract and in reality, it is null and void because there was not full disclosure by the Local Authority, nor was there ‘intent to contract’ on the part of the parents.


The registering of a baby's birth actually passes "ownership" of the baby to the Local Authority and that, and that alone, allows the Local Authority staff to take the child away from the parents if they ever want to do that. This applies until the child reaches the 'age of maturity' set by the current legal statutes. Doing that is not "lawful" but after the birth has been registered, it is "legal" and there is a world of difference between those two terms, a difference which it is very important that you come to understand clearly.


Meet Your Strawman
http://yourstrawman.com/

Again corporations are mentioned - a little snippet:-

Then check it out via Dun & Bradstreet or any of the other places which records the setting up and performance of the 160,000,000 commercial companies world-wide. When you do that, you will discover that, for example, the House of Commons is a commercial for-profit company (number UC2279443), The Labour Party is a commercial company which trades under the name of “Allister Darling MP”, The House of Lords which is the highest court in the land is a private company, the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd. formerly known as the “United Kingdom plc” and which never complied with the law which requires it to file it's financial records, is also a private company. The Ministry of Justice D-U-N-S Number 22-549-8526, Directors: Lord Falconer of Thoroton is a private company set up in the year 1600. The Bank of England is a private company, as is every Court and every Police Force and even the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry is a company and not a person.


Plenty of interesting information - have a flask of coffee and pen and paper to take notes!
 

revzen

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Location
England
The Ultimate Delusion: Great Britain owns the USA
by Stephen Ames

Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows: S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997.

See APFN Web Pages: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/knighthood.htm ; http://www.apfn.org/apfn/queen.htm

At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:
“This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997.”

Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England?

This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law. Remember, King George was the “Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America.” See: Treaty of Peace (1783) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large 80.. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA ..’
What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. and 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)

The United States is not a land mass, it is a corporation.
Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.

On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. King George funded both sides of the Revolutionary War.

Now the Articles of Confederation which were declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12:
“All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.”

The Articles of Confederation acknowledge the debt owed to King George.

Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, the conquest was not yet complete. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so called founding fathers were going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt.

On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another’s debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed.

The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote.

See APFN web page http://www.apfn.org/apfn/money.htm


On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don’t believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject.

What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person.
“Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person.” 9 F. Supp 272 “Word “person” does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.

There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction. For an in-depth look into the nature of these corporations and to see how you also have been declared a fictional entity. See: AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE. JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS. VOL.XIII By James De Witt Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law School), LL.D. (Ruskin University) from La Salle University. This book explains in detail the nature and purpose of these corporations, you will be stunned at what you read.

Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution.

Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it states; “All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.”

Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it. The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States. Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia’s duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I’ll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the founding fathers, their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can’t. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!!

If you don’t believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states ” But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it.”

Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15) which states that it is the militia’s job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States…. the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is their duty to collect our substance. As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King’s commerce and make us slaves. If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find “The Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation”. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794 which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King’s Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was, he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the King wanted them here.

Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems, but they too are for the most part also slaves. Jewish Law does however govern the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit: “Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment’s of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactment’s and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher.”
We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as (“Civil law and procedure”).

Now turn to the “The Shetars Effect on English Law” — A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in “The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200.” It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code which is private international law. The written credit agreement — the Jewish shetar is a lien on all of the property in the world. The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great Britain and that the Jews are in charge of the Baking system.

We are living under the Babylonian Talmud. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the various religions ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist. Private International Law, which is commercial law, only deals with fictions, known as persons. A person is a fictional entity at law, not a living being. See UCC 1-201.

Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I’m sorry people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below.

“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it.” Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520 You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you. Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property!

Here are just a couple of examples:
“The primary control and custody of infants is with the government” Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62

“Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state.” Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.

“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called ‘ownership” is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra)

You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor.

“The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and never can exist under government.” Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481

Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government.

See APFN web page http://www.apfn.org/apfn/irstax.htm

All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB’s-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. with holding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a.

These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn’t it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K.? Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets connected to it’s udders ? The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don’t even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money, which is debt. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all breed more slaves.

You see, we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope. Now the picture will become much clearer after reading the next few paragraphs. We will now show the Popes involvement in the scheme of things. “Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations.” Article (3) Treaty of Varona (1822)

If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world?

The Pope (Vicar of Christ) claims to be the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1492.

Don’t let this information alarm you because without it you cannot be free, You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but fictional entities which have been placed into your mind, you will understand that our slavery is because we believe in fictions.

http://www.natural-person.ca/pdf/Great_Britain_owns_USA.PDF

Confused? Don't believe it? Click the link below for a very good read explaining everything slowly and in great detail
http://anationbeguiled.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/the-real-history-of-the-united-states-of-america/
 

Living Food

New member
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Location
USA
Original Poster
when our parents complete our Birth Certificate they are signing ownership over to the government! :shock:

snippet:-

It all started when your parents had a happy event and you entered the world. You don't know exactly when that was, because you were not aware of the days of the week, the months of the year or even what year it was.

Even after some months had gone by, you still were not aware of these things, but by that time, your strawman had already been created and it was being used to make some very unscrupulous people rich. None of this was your fault. It happened because your parents were fooled into thinking that they needed to register your birth and get a birth certificate for you. So, they APPLIED for a birth certificate, not understanding what would happen when they did. Well then, what did happen? According to the Local Authority:

1. They lost ownership of their baby (you).
2. They allowed a strawman to be created.


This is not something which they can be blamed for, as nobody told them it would, or even could, happen. Nor did anybody tell them what a strawman is or how it can be used against their baby. In actual fact, the “registration” is a contract and in reality, it is null and void because there was not full disclosure by the Local Authority, nor was there ‘intent to contract’ on the part of the parents.


The registering of a baby's birth actually passes "ownership" of the baby to the Local Authority and that, and that alone, allows the Local Authority staff to take the child away from the parents if they ever want to do that. This applies until the child reaches the 'age of maturity' set by the current legal statutes. Doing that is not "lawful" but after the birth has been registered, it is "legal" and there is a world of difference between those two terms, a difference which it is very important that you come to understand clearly.


Meet Your Strawman
http://yourstrawman.com/

Again corporations are mentioned - a little snippet:-

Then check it out via Dun & Bradstreet or any of the other places which records the setting up and performance of the 160,000,000 commercial companies world-wide. When you do that, you will discover that, for example, the House of Commons is a commercial for-profit company (number UC2279443), The Labour Party is a commercial company which trades under the name of “Allister Darling MP”, The House of Lords which is the highest court in the land is a private company, the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd. formerly known as the “United Kingdom plc” and which never complied with the law which requires it to file it's financial records, is also a private company. The Ministry of Justice D-U-N-S Number 22-549-8526, Directors: Lord Falconer of Thoroton is a private company set up in the year 1600. The Bank of England is a private company, as is every Court and every Police Force and even the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry is a company and not a person.


Plenty of interesting information - have a flask of coffee and pen and paper to take notes!
Great - I thought I'd have to talk about all this by myself! I can safely research other things while knowing that this subject is in the capable hands of Revzen :)

Any idea WHEN this happened? When dd world governments become corporations?
It started in 1933 for the US, which is when the Government became bankrupt. But the whole thing was partially implemented and in the works for centuries. It just became "official" in 1933 and they got even more power.

You could also say that it started in 1302 when the Vatican claimed control of the whole world [they still own the entire world save Washington DC and one square mile in London, you don't own your property], but again it goes back even further.
 

Top