Well, I just thought of something else...

I was thinking that there is no way there could ever be an NWO, as really what world governments are going to cooperate for that? And who is going to lead it?

Well, I guess the UN just needs to do a "Merger" and it's all over....

There goes the neighborhood... Sort of like Taco Bell and McDonalds doing a merger, we will have our one world government, and one world currency..

However, I don't see how one world currency would ever work out.. The Euro certainly hasn't done so hot, but then, I guess the worldwide currency would be the US currency..

But if there was only one world currency, then how would the exchanges etc work? I mean, if you in essence had only one world government, and only one world currency, then items manufactured overseas would cost the same as the ones manufactured in the US (in theory)...

This can't really be a good business model?

Just saying....

The original plan was to split the world into 3 jurisdictions - the EU, the Americas + Mexico, and Asia. Then after people had the time to get used to that all 3 would become one. Always move slowly so the masses never catch on until it's too late.

The NATO countries, especially the US, are the "enforcers" of the NWO. It's why we're always going off to war with other countries - trust me, it has nothing to do with humanitarian reasons and the media lies through their teeth ("OMG they've got WMDs", or "they're oppressing the people"). In the case of Syria, for example, the rebels are just as bad as the regime and many of them are mercenaries working for the PTB. They always fund and supply both sides of any war and play both sides against each other with the casualties of their little games being us normal folk. Any government that isn't already controlled by the PTB is going to be brought down, and even those that are can still be the subject of wars...more money for the bankers and arms manufacturers, makes the masses afraid, and causes depopulation; war is a very productive activity for the PTB.

The PTB don't care, they've got ungodly sums of money and the ruling families make Bill Gates (who works for them) look like a pauper. Besides, they want to kill off the majority of the population anyway.

The Organic Act of 1871 was the Act that sold us down the river and replaced our de jure government with a corporation. What nobody ever bothered to tell you was that the "Federal government" ONLY has jurisdiction in DC.

Some notes I took from the Organic Act:

"Nor shall the legislative assembly have power to establish any bank of circulation, nor to authorize any company or individual to issue notes for circulation as money and currency" [end of section 17] - *cough cough* Federal Reserve Act, anyone?

"That the legislative power of the District shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation within said District" [section 18 beginning] - in other words, the government only has jurisdiction within DC.

"That the said legislative assembly shall not have the power...to tax the property of the United States" [section 20] - implies that DC and the United States are separate entities? Also only gives power to tax property within DC.

"That the property of that portion of the District not included in the corporations of Washington and Georgetown..." [section 21 beginning] 'Nuff said.

Section 22 calls both Georgetown and Washington "corporations", multiple times. I'm too lazy to type out the whole section though.

Section 25 implies DC courts can only enforce DC laws.

Section 28 is so mindblowing, I'm going to type the whole thing out here: "That the said legislative assembly shall have power to create by general law, modify, repeal, or amend, within said District, corporations aggregate for religious, charitable, educational, industrial, or commercial purposes, and to define their powers and liabilities; Provided, That the powers of corporations so created shall be limited to the District of Columbia." THIS is the evidence proving that our "government" only has jurisdiction in DC.

Section 40 again calls Washington and Georgetown corporations (in the beginning) .

"And upon the repeal of the charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown, the District of Columbia be, and is hereby declared, the successor of said corporations" [section 41]

Sure, some people might argue that by "corporation" they mean "municipal corporation", ie "An incorporated political subdivision of a state that is composed of the citizens of a designated geographic area and which performs certain state functions on a local level and possesses such powers as are conferred upon it by the state." (https://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...al+Corporation), but I don't buy that. With legal terms being as precise as they are, there's no way they would make such a huge "mistake". Oops, looks like we accidentally made a corporation that rules the nation instead of a capital for the US government...oh well. NO, it was intentional.

The Organic Act of 1871, for anyone interested in reading it: https://www.dcvote.org/trellis/strugg...ation_1871.pdf

More on how the Organic Act of 1871 created a corporation called THE UNITED STATES: https://byronwine.com/files/1871.pdf

https://www.supremelaw.org/decs/dccases/woodbury.htm

Nobody ever notices when they go to court that the flag in the corner is NOT the US flag. C'mon, people, it's right there in front of you. See:

ACTUAL US FLAG




THE FLAG FOUND IN COURTROOMS




See the difference? Even the CEO of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA always stands in front of the second (fake) flag:

What is all that fuzzy gold stuff around the edge? Oh that's nothing, don't pay any attention to that. It's ah, just a decoration.
Yes it is just a decoration but one that tells you who is really in charge.