I've seen that before as well. It's unbelievable that something that good, from just a small injection of Glycoprotein, can actually produce pretty much complete eradication of seemingly any kinds of Cancers, without any side effects or reoccurance.
What I still don't understand, is why it isn't being used. Protocol, Red Tape, Politics?
Unbelievable possibilities, but also unbelievable it isn't being used.
Bill Sardi has retired this site, I'm sorry to say.
I really don't understand why he didn't keep the site up as an archive. imo, it was a selfish move, as he still has his site up for all his e-books, where he says:
Quote:
Bill derives no personal income from the sales. All profits go to offset costs for advertising and web expenses. Your book orders help maintain the availability of these health books to the public at large. You can read about Bill Sardi at his site KH (https://www.knowledgeofhealth.com/)
Many of you may not be aware of the changes to the internet landscape.
The Knowledge of Health website is serving as a source of free
content for other websites that steal the information, drive traffic
to their websites with it, and generate income from google click fees.
We simply can no longer police the misuse of the information.
With declining web traffic, much of it being directed elsewhere,
there is no sense going on with the tedious and expensive chore
of writing and maintaining the website. The website for books,
NaturalHealthLibrarian.com will remain online, however 90% of the
profits pay for google ads that generate most of the traffic to the site,
and the remaining profit goes to pay the webmaster. So the
books are essentially being offered as a public service.
Bill Sardi
seems there are alternative sites with sub-standard principles that just copied copyrighted material from Bill Sardi's site to their own, to boost their own products. I guess Sardi got tired of policing it..
My problem is that he should update his ebook site to not say thatthe proceeds from the ebooks are supporting the free information website... when there is no free information website anymore.
</div>
Well, I guess I said that because I've seen so many sites that have removed helpful information due to FDA regulations getting tight. How many doctors and researchers have been arrested or had their offices raided for making claims in favor of natural remedies? The supplement sales companies used to provide a lot of useful information on remedies and their uses, but now they describe the product briefly and leave off what to use it for.
I am probably as guilty as anyone about copying and pasting but I don't think I've copied anything from Bill Sardi.
Well, I guess I said that because I've seen so many sites that have removed helpful information due to FDA regulations getting tight. How many doctors and researchers have been arrested or had their offices raided for making claims in favor of natural remedies? The supplement sales companies used to provide a lot of useful information on remedies and their uses, but now they describe the product briefly and leave off what to use it for.
can you give me an example of a site where you've seen this happen?
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightowl
I am probably as guilty as anyone about copying and pasting but I don't think I've copied anything from Bill Sardi.
I think Bill Sardi is talking about sites copying stuff from his site for their webpages to help sell their product (and I am making assumptions from what he said, because he wasn't exactly clear).
but as far as FDA closing him down.. no. and if they were to do that, they would close down his e-books and those are still going strong. </div>
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightowl
Well, I guess I said that because I've seen so many sites that have removed helpful information due to FDA regulations getting tight. How many doctors and researchers have been arrested or had their offices raided for making claims in favor of natural remedies? The supplement sales companies used to provide a lot of useful information on remedies and their uses, but now they describe the product briefly and leave off what to use it for.
************
Quote:
Origionally Posted by scorpiotiger
can you give me an example of a site where you've seen this happen?
************
I suppose I should have said that, in my opinion, the information was removed due to pressure from the drug lords.
Going through my old favorite links list, this site stopped selling a product but left the original product information, I assume, because they couldn't legally do both: https://www.fungusfocus.com/html/product_guide.htm
************
This site used to have a lot of information. Scroll down to where it says "DEA Change in Regulation.....
Then click on the link "About Lugol's Solution of Iodine and it's Antiviral Properties". You will find product sales information, such as this:
Lugol's Solution of Iodine 5% (Equivalent to USP or Higher) - Discussed in Folk Medicine, Dr Jarvis understood something about the benefits of iodine that few others do today. Disclaimer: Though Dr. Jarvis refers to the many qualities of Lugol's Solution it is offered here only as a "talisman". We are aware of its regular use in the past as a general purpose traditional disinfectant however, we make no claims with respect to its efficacy for any purpose whatsoever. Order online
1 oz. amber glass bottle with dropper. Shipping: $5.95 DEA/FDA Limit Ex 102: 1 bottle per sale/transaction. Additional bottles as separate single transactions only.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET for Lugol's Solution of Iodine 5%
I did eventually find some information after digging around, but it has definately been shortened, revised and the FDA and DEA's influence is put out front for everyone to see.
*************
I could name another one that I've followed for over 10 years if you would like a private message, but I don't see dragging others into this discussion publicly. I don't have to answer to anyone but myself.
I suppose I should have said that, in my opinion, the information was removed due to pressure from the drug lords.
Going through my old favorite links list, this site stopped selling a product but left the original product information, I assume, because they couldn't legally do both: https://www.fungusfocus.com/html/product_guide.htm
nightowl, from what I've seen, if the FDA closes down the sale of something alternative, the company usually makes an announcement about it.
if they don't, probably the reason they no longer sell it is because they couldn't sell enough of it.
I have a friend that used to be in the health food business. I did some website work for him. He eventually decided to switch businesses because the product he was selling was for a more narrow field in alternative health.. and he just couldn't make a living from it. The alternative health field is very competitive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightowl
************
This site used to have a lot of information. Scroll down to where it says "DEA Change in Regulation.....
Then click on the link "About Lugol's Solution of Iodine and it's Antiviral Properties". You will find product sales information, such as this:
Lugol's Solution of Iodine 5% (Equivalent to USP or Higher) - Discussed in Folk Medicine, Dr Jarvis understood something about the benefits of iodine that few others do today. Disclaimer: Though Dr. Jarvis refers to the many qualities of Lugol's Solution it is offered here only as a "talisman". We are aware of its regular use in the past as a general purpose traditional disinfectant however, we make no claims with respect to its efficacy for any purpose whatsoever. Order online
1 oz. amber glass bottle with dropper. Shipping: $5.95 DEA/FDA Limit Ex 102: 1 bottle per sale/transaction. Additional bottles as separate single transactions only.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET for Lugol's Solution of Iodine 5%
I did eventually find some information after digging around, but it has definately been shortened, revised and the FDA and DEA's influence is put out front for everyone to see.
*************
yes, I know about the iodine restricition. they started looking at restricting the amount of iodine that could be sold at one time because iodine was being used in the illegal manufacture of crystal meth.
SUMMARY: This rulemaking changes the regulation of the listed chemical iodine under the chemical regulatory provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) believes that this action is necessary to remove deficiencies in the existing regulatory controls, which have been exploited by drug traffickers who divert iodine (in the form of iodine crystals and iodine tincture) for the illicit production of methamphetamine in clandestine drug laboratories. This rulemaking moves iodine from List II to List I; reduces the iodine threshold from 0.4 kilograms to zero kilograms; adds import and export regulatory controls; and controls
[[Page 35921]]
chemical mixtures containing greater than 2.2 percent iodine.
This rulemaking establishes regulatory controls that will apply to iodine crystals and iodine chemical mixtures that contain greater than 2.2 percent iodine. This regulation therefore controls iodine crystals and strong iodine tinctures/solutions (e.g., 7 percent iodine) that do not have common household uses and instead have limited application in livestock, horses, and for disinfection of equipment. Household products such as 2 percent iodine tincture/solution and household disinfectants containing iodine complexes will not be adversely impacted by this regulation. Additionally, the final rule exempts transactions of up to one-fluid-ounce (30 ml) of Lugol's Solution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightowl
I could name another one that I've followed for over 10 years if you would like a private message, but I don't see dragging others into this discussion publicly. I don't have to answer to anyone but myself.
ok.. thanks. I'm a curious cat, so I'd like to know.
I agree... if the government can put certain information about an herb on a government website, then I don't know how the government can say the information isn't legit.
well, I will be following this one. Thanks for pointing it out.
A case of one rule for one, and one for the rest.
I feel after reading about that case, it very much will boil down to ethics, and transparency of information.
If you allow government departments, to proliferate that information, you cannot prohibit it's proliferation in my mind, unless you sanction it's used I.E. via things like Copyrights, trademarks, publication restrictions notices, etc etc that must be present at he point of source.
If the legal outcome is, that this FTC are acting unethically, then more fool the FTC, as they will pay a big price no doubt.
Another prime example of shameful behaviour, by some organisation, too scared of what the little people are doing.
Cancer Cured for Good?
Linear Mode
