� #1
Old 08-19-2012, 02:12 PM
Reader
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California
Posts: 171
JanH is on a distinguished road
Default Treat Cancer with Oxygen?

From Dr. Robert Rowen�s Second Opinion e-newsletter:

Are conventional cancer treatments based on bad science?

Years ago, Nobel Prize winner Otto Warburg, MD found that a key cause of cancer is low oxygen. People either don't get enough oxygen or their body doesn't effectively utilize the oxygen they do get. But modern medicine doesn't buy this explanation for cancer. They insist that gene mutations are the cause. Now a new study confirms what Warburg discovered and completely changes how you should prevent and treat cancer.This study, from the University of Georgia, has sent spears into modern theories that genetic mutations are the cause. The researchers' findings, based on RNA in cells, suggest that low oxygen is actually the main driver. In fact, the less oxygen there is, the more uncontrollable the cancer grows.

How might this occur? As oxygen levels drop, tumor cells become starved for energy, so they become more anaerobic. This ferments glucose, rather than burning it like it would normally. The cells then make proteins to grow new blood vessels to get in a blood supply and oxygen. They grow. As they grow, they outstrip their fragile blood supply regenerating the low oxygen cycle blood vessel growth cycle. It's a vicious cycle. Many integrative physicians are working on ways to increase tumor oxygenation on the belief that the tumors will behave better. Cancer cells do have mitochondria (energy furnaces), which are highly efficient oxygen-burning energy producers compared to fermentation. Problem is, they aren't working well. Studies have shown that if you can switch the mitochondria on or made more efficient, they help make proteins that trigger cell suicide. That's how one drug, DCA, works.Terri and I study oxidation therapies extensively. These therapies increase tissue oxygenation, which can slow tumor growth. Ozone guru Velio Bocci, MD of Italy has suggested the use of ozone therapy to increase tumor oxygenation. We're aware of some promising results. I reported about three of these cases in the latest issue of Second Opinion. One of them with metastatic melanoma is in complete remission. One with metastatic colon cancer with massive tumors to his liver has seen his liver tumors disappear. He went on to have the primary colon tumor removed and a year after surgery he is still cancer free. A third with lung cancer has had no growth of his cancer. Of course, not all respond so favorably. Any positive results here are exciting since oxidation therapy is essentially completely non-toxic. Author Ying Xu stressed the importance of testing the new model through future experimental cancer research. "If the model holds, researchers will need to search for methods to prevent hypoxia in cells in the first place, which could result in a sea change in cancer treatment." Xu explained that this new cancer-growth model could help explain why many cancers become drug resistant so quickly, often within three to six months.The best answer to cancer is to prevent it. Eat right. Detox. And exercise. All these will help prevent a climate of low oxygen, which would predispose to cancer. You can also visit a doctor who performs oxidation therapies for additional protection and to treat illness. You can find these doctors at www.acam.org.Yours for better health and medical freedom,

Robert J. Rowen, MD
Ref: ScienceDaily, May 3, 2012.
Reply With Quote
� #2
Old 10-01-2012, 07:43 PM
Observer
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 19
Auntie Eisel is on a distinguished road
Default

It is a known fact that if you want to inhibit the growth of cancer cells in a lab setting, just turn up the oxygen and starve them of glucose. This article is definitely on the right track. There are ways to turn up the O2 in your body and there is cutting out the various sugars that are consumed on a daily basis also. And as the good doctor suggests, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Reply With Quote
� #3
Old 10-02-2012, 08:17 AM
Arrowwind09's Avatar
Standing at the Portal
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,563
Arrowwind09 will become famous soon enoughArrowwind09 will become famous soon enough
Default

If you really want to treat cancer with oxygen you will use Ozone.

Although not mentioned in this article this is what Rowen used to cure cancer in a Governor of Alaska, which prompted the inclusion of alternative medicine to the conventional doctors tool kit due to that Governors effort.
__________________
"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." Marcus Aurelius
Reply With Quote
� #4
Old 10-03-2012, 10:01 PM
Observer
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 19
Auntie Eisel is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arrowwind09 View Post
If you really want to treat cancer with oxygen you will use Ozone.

Although not mentioned in this article this is what Rowen used to cure cancer in a Governor of Alaska, which prompted the inclusion of alternative medicine to the conventional doctors tool kit due to that Governors effort.
I'm glad to hear at least some people a not trying to cover up the fact that simple cures are out there for this plague of modern day living.
Reply With Quote
� #5
Old 01-05-2013, 09:00 PM
Observer
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brick new jersey
Posts: 1
Dale is on a distinguished road
Default

Its all about the money....
Reply With Quote
Reply Bookmark and Share

Tags
cancer treatment, oxygen

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does The Natural Supplement IP6 Treat Cancer? dgaubatz Cancer 4 10-10-2011 12:28 PM
A mineral and oxygen dietary supplement truestorytotell Vitamins & Supplements 13 08-04-2011 06:44 PM
Is oxygen good or bad? chasmauch General Discussions 4 05-05-2009 10:59 PM
resveratrol and IP6 to treat cancer MsKathy Cancer 11 03-30-2009 04:31 PM
Oxygen therapy for the face? just me Alternative Therapies 0 02-19-2007 02:10 PM