Watch before 20th June - Dr Stanislaw Burzynski The Cancer Cure the FDA do not want
The following link will play a 1hr 45m video which is free to watch up until 20th June 2011 only. I watched this last night and it brought me to tears, seeing families begging in court for their loved ones to be given the chance to carry on taking a thoroughly researched drug, with little to no side effects and far superior results than conventional treatment.
The only problem is that the FDA have spent millions of tax payers dollars to stop this medicine being made available to protect their multi billion dollar cancer industry which requires very expensive and damaging therapies. The multiple court cases against the doctor intentionally do not dispute the ability to cure, because the results are there for all to see.
Very sad, very annoying, but a must watch video that shows how big pharma doesn't give a damn about saving lives - only making profits.
Burzynski, the Movie is the story of a medical doctor and Ph.D biochemist named Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski who won the largest, and possibly the most convoluted and intriguing legal battle against the Food & Drug Administration in American history.
His victorious battles with the United States government were centered around Dr. Burzynski�s gene-targeted cancer medicines he discovered in the 1970′s called Antineoplastons, which have currently completed Phase II FDA-supervised clinical trials in 2009 and could begin the final phase of FDA testing in 2011�barring the ability to raise the required $150 million to fund the final phase of FDA clinical trials.
When Antineoplastons are approved, it will mark the first time in history a single scientist, not a pharmaceutical company, will hold the exclusive patent and distribution rights on a paradigm-shifting medical breakthrough.
Antineoplastons are responsible for curing some of the most incurable forms of terminal cancer. Various cancer survivors are presented in the film who chose these medicines instead of surgery, chemotherapy or radiation � with full disclosure of medical records to support their diagnosis and recovery � as well as systematic (non-anecdotal) FDA-supervised clinical trial data comparing Antineoplastons to other available treatments�which is published within the peer-reviewed medical literature.
One form of cancer � diffuse, intrinsic, childhood brainstem glioma has never before been cured in any scientifically controlled clinical trial in the history of medicine. Antineoplastons hold the first cures in history � dozens of them. [ANP - PubMed 2003] [ANP - PubMed 2006] [Rad & other - PubMed 2008] [Chemo/Rad - PubMed 2005]
This documentary takes the audience through the treacherous, yet victorious, 14-year journey both Dr. Burzynski and his patients have had to endure in order to obtain FDA-approved clinical trials of Antineoplastons.
Dr. Burzynski resides and practices medicine in Houston, Texas. He was able to initially produce and administer his discovery without FDA-approval from 1977-1995 because the state of Texas at this time did not require that Texas physicians be required to adhere to Federal law in this situation. This law has since been changed.
As with anything that changes current-day paradigms, Burzynski�s ability to successfully treat incurable cancer with such consistency has baffled the industry. Ironically, this fact had prompted numerous investigations by the Texas Medical Board, who relentlessly took Dr. Burzynski as high as the state supreme court in their failed attempt to halt his practices.
Likewise, the Food and Drug Administration engaged in four Federal Grand Juries spanning over a decade attempting to indict Dr. Burzynski, all of which ended in no finding of fault on his behalf. Finally, Dr. Burzynski was indicted in their 5th Grand Jury in 1995, resulting in two federal trials and two sets of jurors finding him not guilty of any wrongdoing. If convicted, Dr. Burzynski would have faced a maximum of 290 years in a federal prison and $18.5 million in fines.
However, what was revealed a few years after Dr. Burzynski won his freedom, helps to paint a more coherent picture regarding the true motivation of the United States government�s relentless persecution of Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D.
Note: When Antineoplastons are approved for pubic use, it will allow a single scientist to hold an exclusive license to manufacture and sell these medicines on the open market�before they become generic�leaving PhRMA absent in profiting from the most effective gene-targeted cancer treatment the world has ever seen.
__________________
Please be advised
I advocate all health blogs linked to NMT.
Read them and explore MMS and CS.
It may be the best chance that you have to heal yourself
I watched that movie and liked it so much that I bought it. It was only 14 bucks and 5 for shiping. Good deal.
__________________ Doctors give drugs of which they know little, into bodies, of which they know less, for diseases of which they know nothing at all.
Voltaire
This video shows just how corrupt the FDA really is.
I have alot of respect for Dr. Jullian Whitaker. He learned a long time ago that mainstream medicine was controlled by big Pharma, and most proceedures were useless. That is also why he helped raise $700,000 for Stan's defence.
The Polish doctor could not only cure most brain cancers, but could do it without side effects.
__________________
Let Food Be Your Medicine And Medicine Be Your Food.(Hippocrates)
No. This "miracle cure" doctor is nothing more than one in a long line of quacks with a TOTALLY unproven "cure" that cures nothing. It is sad - and potentially deadly - to see people believe something simply because they wish it to be true.
No. This "miracle cure" doctor is nothing more than one in a long line of quacks with a TOTALLY unproven "cure" that cures nothing. It is sad - and potentially deadly - to see people believe something simply because they wish it to be true.
Among the info you'll find is that the author, Dr Moss, is simply a writer (and former publicist fired from Sloan Kettering) with a doctorate in philosophy. He is no physician, no medical doctor of any kind (let alone oncologist), not even possessing any medical training. Not exactly the kind of guy I'm willing to trust with my health/life or likely to even take seriously when it comes to largely unproven and frankly questionable medical opinions.
As for the whole "evil big pharm/govt conspiracy" thing - I worked for "the feds" (not the FDA) many years and have no problem telling you I have seen first hand many, many examples of their inefficiency, stupidity, etc etc. Believe me, I am no fan. You won't hear me saying how wonderful they are in general. I have also had very mixed experiences with doctors and hospitals. But the whole conspiracy thing I find rather weak, as well as frustrating as to how many people buy into it despite a glaring lack of evidence. It is best left to movies.
I also have to say I find it ironic that some seem to think pharm. companies and govt are all about greed yet have no problem with this guy charging $60 ( ! ) for this book. If Ralph Moss is so much more noble or whatever, why doesn't he give it away? Or sell it much cheaper? Could it be he's in it for a buck too?
Among the info you'll find is that the author, Dr Moss, is simply a writer (and former publicist fired from Sloan Kettering) with a doctorate in philosophy. He is no physician, no medical doctor of any kind (let alone oncologist), not even possessing any medical training. Not exactly the kind of guy I'm willing to trust with my health/life or likely to even take seriously when it comes to largely unproven and frankly questionable medical opinions.
As for the whole "evil big pharm/govt conspiracy" thing - I worked for "the feds" (not the FDA) many years and have no problem telling you I have seen first hand many, many examples of their inefficiency, stupidity, etc etc. Believe me, I am no fan. You won't hear me saying how wonderful they are in general. I have also had very mixed experiences with doctors and hospitals. But the whole conspiracy thing I find rather weak, as well as frustrating as to how many people buy into it despite a glaring lack of evidence. It is best left to movies.
I also have to say I find it ironic that some seem to think pharm. companies and govt are all about greed yet have no problem with this guy charging $60 ( ! ) for this book. If Ralph Moss is so much more noble or whatever, why doesn't he give it away? Or sell it much cheaper? Could it be he's in it for a buck too?
I used the library. But big pharma surpresses alternative treatments that work and many conventional ones do not (they do work for some cancers) but for most they kill you.
Smart! My point was that people selling or promoting alternative or "natural" healing, or railing against the "medical establishment," are often out to make a buck as well.
Quote:
But big pharma surpresses alternative treatments that work and many conventional ones do not (they do work for some cancers) but for most they kill you.
No, I'm sorry, that's incorrect. Most conventional cancer treatments do not kill the patient, although it is possible and I'm sure has happened. You'll note that unlike some here, I do not bury my head in the sand and delude myself that "my way" is the only way or has all the answers.
I also know for a fact that conventional cancer treatments have prolonged or even saved many, many lives. For example, did you know breast cancer has about a 90% cure rate? Guess what, most of those cured don't do so by taking "natural remedies." They have surgery to take out the tumor and (typically) radiation to kill any residual cancer cells in that localized area.
Also you might consider that at least some alternative treatments have killed people as well - perhaps not in the treatment itself, but due to the fact that it didn't do anything to stop or slow the cancer.
As for the conspiracy theory thing, what evidence do you have that "big pharm" supresses any alternative treatments? It's true that they might not advocate or sell them, but that's simply because they won't make any money off of them - and remember, they are a business, not a charity. Why would they?
I and hubby have watched the Burzynsky movie right through. and find it very informative and very exiting to see how he has been able to cure cancer patients.
I have just been banned from a forum about 3 weeks ago because I believed so strongly about the good this Dr was doing and I wanted to share it with the people on this other forum, the skeptics that were ridiculing me because of the post got me to the point where I said you should watch the movie before making negative comments about him ,and they said you should find yourself a forum for quacks and join that, anyway I'm glad that they banned me as I wouldn;t have found this wonderful site to join otherwise, I new that there must be other people out there that can believe there is a natural cure for most ailments,I for one am a childhood cancer surviver that was sent home from hospital with only 3 weeks to live at 21 months of age, and I'm still here 63 years later to tell the story so I will not be convinced that there isn't a natural cure for cancer.
ozzie
My point was that people selling or promoting alternative or "natural" healing, or railing against the "medical establishment," are often out to make a buck as well.
Everyone is out to make bucks. It doesn't matter if it's conventional or alternative. My point is that there is always going to be someone out to get money as long as healthcare is a business. No need to bother arguing on the money matters, since it is the same for all types of healthcare.
__________________
Consider: Ametures built the ark, Professionals built the Titanic!
Everyone is out to make bucks. It doesn't matter if it's conventional or alternative. My point is that there is always going to be someone out to get money as long as healthcare is a business. No need to bother arguing on the money matters, since it is the same for all types of healthcare.
But it is 100% true! Sure some doctors and reserches are taking up this type of employment because they care for people. But they still need to make a living, so they are still thinking of how to make the best money that they can.
Stan Burzynski's Cancer Cure
In fact just a paragraph or 3 should be enough.
My point was that people selling or promoting alternative or "natural" healing, or railing against the "medical establishment," are often out to make a buck as well. 
Linear Mode
