Bldg 7 was not one of the 100 story plus ones, it was brought down in a controlled demolition, but why? The other 2 were not controlled demolished but fell on their own. Trade towers were designed to take a jet hit, but not one filled with fuel. try and see what the data tells you insyead of trying to make the data fit a curve.
Sorry but jet fuel that went up in a flash did not create enough heat to melt steel for a long enough period of time.
There were puddles of molten steal at the bottom of the heap.
I do not create data. I look at what the experts are telling.
Also, people at the bottom of the WTC heard explosions at the bottom of the building.
These buidlings did not fall on their own. You need to watch Loose Change.. both the original version and the new version.
Thermite was found in the WTC dust and puffs of smoke were seen far below the impact site just before it came down. The plane was filled with fuel and controlled demolition took the building down.
Ultimately all this means that black box US operations took all those people in the 4 planes of 9/11 and murdered them... which somehow even seems colder than what we are led to believe.. There were no people in any of these planes, except possibly the one that crashed in the field, but that was taken out in mid flight. The crash site is only where a remnant hit the ground.. Likely the other three planes were exploded over the ocean.
Now here is Scientist Neils Harrit from the University of Copenhagen as he speaks about his research on the use of thermite in the WTC buildings 1 and 2
He clearly explains all the issues about temperature.
Molton iron was at 750 degrees 3 days after the collaple in the rubble.
Jet fuel cannot do this.
you heat up steel you weaken it, grain growth takes minutes at higher temps.
Granted. But you cannot melt steel with burning jet fuel (kerosene) so where did all the molten steel that was found come from? I think we all probably have seen pictures of building fires where the steel roof rafters have collapsed from the heat, but they are not melted just deformed.
And what about the support beams below were the plane hit. These beams were not weaken by the fire yet the building collapsed as if they were not even there.
Granted. But you cannot melt steel with burning jet fuel (kerosene) so where did all the molten steel that was found come from? I think we all probably have seen pictures of building fires where the steel roof rafters have collapsed from the heat, but they are not melted just deformed.
And what about the support beams below were the plane hit. These beams were not weaken by the fire yet the building collapsed as if they were not even there.
You have to sift the facts from the bullshit and whoever was behind this made sure there is 100 times bullshit to confuse the facts. Unlike JFK where the facts are obvious.
Some people are suggesting that there was a sort of cosmic new weapon used to take these buildings down. I was reading about it last night... some sort of energy weapon. Some woman wrote a book about it....but I didn't collect up the details.
In my opinion, the evidence is so strong that the 911 truthers have that that is what we should go with. Bringing in new ideas about super weapons that black box operations may or may not have will get us nowhere to condemning those who did this. I wish this meeting in Toranto this past weekend was held in the Hague instead... perhaps someday we will see those accountable for this crucified and our national house cleansed.
This Video Proves Controlled Demolition of Bldg 7
Hybrid Mode
