Go Back   Natural Medicine Talk > Health > Vitamins & Supplements

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2010, 08:20 PM
D Bergy D Bergy is offline
Enlightener
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 570
D Bergy will become famous soon enough
Default Vitamin D & possible antibiotic effects

I found a discussion on Lymenet that I thought was interesting. The article talks about the effects of high dose vitamin D and UV blood irradiation. It would seem the effect that comes from UV blood irradiation is a big increase in Vitamin D in the blood, and it may have an antibiotic effect.

Here is a link to it.

http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/newsl...une-july.shtml

Dan

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-16-2010, 08:40 PM
nightowl nightowl is offline
Beloved enlightener...always with us in spirit
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: S.W. Washington
Posts: 762
nightowl is on a distinguished road
Default

I can't believe a researcher is limited to studies using 2000 IU vitamin D per day, and yet pharmaceutical corporations can do anything they want??!!! Why do researchers choose that profession at all?! They wonder why we have so many sick people in this country.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-16-2010, 09:51 PM
nightowl nightowl is offline
Beloved enlightener...always with us in spirit
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: S.W. Washington
Posts: 762
nightowl is on a distinguished road
Default

We have so many Vitamin D threads going I thought this might be a good place for this...hope you don't mind D Bergy.
************************


March 16, 2010

Studies support association of higher vitamin D levels with disease risk reduction


The results of two studies conducted by Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute in Murray Utah, presented on March 15, 2010 at the American College of Cardiology's 59th annual scientific session in Atlanta, show that individuals who increase their vitamin D levels experience a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, heart attack, heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes, depression, kidney failure and all-cause mortality over a given period of time.

The first study included 9,491 participants in whom low vitamin D levels of 30 nanograms per milliliter (considered "normal" by some practitioners) or less were detected. Nearly 80 percent of the subjects were women. Among the 47 percent who increased their vitamin D levels to 30 nanograms per milliliter or more between their initial and follow-up examinations, there was a decrease in the risk of coronary artery disease, heart failure, renal failure and death compared with those whose vitamin D levels failed to reach this level.

In the second study, the disease-predictive value of varying levels of vitamin D in 31,289 subjects aged 50 and older was analyzed. The researchers concluded that having a vitamin D level of greater than 43 nanograms per milliliter was optimal to significantly lower the risk of seven out of ten outcomes during the period examined: death, diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, heart failure, depression and renal failure.

"It was very important to discover that the 'normal' levels are too low," noted research team member Dr Heidi T. May. "Giving physicians a higher level to look for gives them one more tool in identifying patients at-risk and offering them better treatment."

"Vitamin D replacement therapy has long been associated with reducing the risk of fractures and diseases of the bone," noted Joseph Brent Muhlestein, MD, who is the director of cardiovascular research at the Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute and co-researcher in both studies. "But our findings show that vitamin D could have far greater implications in the treatment and reduction of cardiovascular disease and other chronic conditions than we previously thought."

Dr Muhlestein remarked that increasing vitamin D intake by supplementing with 1,000 to 5,000 international units per day may be appropriate for some people.

"Although randomized trials would be useful and are coming, I feel there is enough information here for me to start treatment based on these findings," he added.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-17-2010, 07:16 AM
D Bergy D Bergy is offline
Enlightener
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 570
D Bergy will become famous soon enough
Default

I don't mind at all.

I am amazed that the many benefits of vitamin D have only recently come to light, at least for the general public. It would be nice if we had some sort of organized way of presenting it all. There is so much information, it is hard to even get a grip on it.

Thank you for the additional information.

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2010, 12:37 AM
nightowl nightowl is offline
Beloved enlightener...always with us in spirit
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: S.W. Washington
Posts: 762
nightowl is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree. Vitamin D seems to help almost every major illness. I personally feel safer in the 80 to 100 range myself. I need to get mine checked again but still am house-bound and mostly limited to my room...I don't have a ramp to load my wheelchair into our van. My doctor wants thyroid tests too. But it's about an hours drive to the lab. Family can drive me. But just to stand up and walk 4 or 5 feet puts my oxygen down into the low to mid 70% range.I have a lot of healing to do. Oh well, always a mountain to climb!
Reply With Quote
Reply Bookmark and Share

Tags
uvb, vitamin d

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drug-like effects of MMS some1 Alternative Therapies 13 07-04-2011 05:07 PM
MMS - No ill effects Wiregal Alternative Therapies 2 09-12-2010 06:10 PM
Lipitor Side Effects? Gemini Heart Health 16 05-27-2010 04:46 PM
Effects to expect with MMS mlavois Alternative Therapies 3 03-17-2010 04:44 AM
Antibiotic Use in 1960's May Have Sparked MRSA kind2creatures Other Diseases 1 01-24-2010 12:50 PM