Most people do not know that many laws are actually put on the books and kept there for the purpose of creating crimes and criminals. This is one of the key methods used by the rich, powerful, and well-positioned people in the world to push their agendas on the masses who have no choice but to accept their fate. These laws are unjust and those who administer them are criminals. It’s bad enough when countries go to war for no good reason but even worse is when a country’s leaders go against their own civil populations by creating ridiculously unjust laws that merely produce more criminals.
For example, drug laws are criminal laws. They are cruel laws and they breed cruel people who do dark and dirty things. In fact they are worse than cruel. These laws undermine the very fabric of society by destroying civilization from within. Drug laws are weapons of social mass destruction. They are also highly hypocritical, stupid and destined to fail except in their ability to destroy lives and cultures. They are also insane laws because they make the safest drugs illegal and the most toxic and nasty drugs available at pharmacies on every corner.
Drug laws destroy the integrity of the judicial branch of government. Judges sit smugly behind their desks branding human beings as criminals for having health problems. Addictions are not immoral and punishable; they are often brought on by the pharmaceutical industry and the addictive drugs that are prescribed. Drug laws turn judges into dispensers of injustice – not justice.
This is the best collage of clips that have been assembled to suggest that Obama is breaking the law. Certainly he could not be doing this alone. There were plenty of accomplices to this act of treason on both sides of the aisle plus in the courts. One really has to wonder about the legitimacy of the people in power and the people who make the laws if the law can so easily be trampled upon.
__________________ Doctors give drugs of which they know little, into bodies, of which they know less, for diseases of which they know nothing at all.
Voltaire
Which laws are you talking about being broken. The only one, I see, is
Exodus 20:16"Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour." Exodus is a book in the Christian Bible and that is the 16th of the top commandments.
And in Deuteronomy 5:6–21, it is the 20th commandment. "Neither shall you bear false witness against your neighbor." Since it is the 20th, it might be OK to ignore.
That video is so chopped up, that there are nothing but lies.
__________________
-
- Jim
The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return. - Eden Abbez
Which laws are you talking about being broken. The only one, I see, is
The only law that matters here is our constitution and it clearly states that only a natural born citizen can be president.
The easiest way to prove this is to show a birth certificate. So why would Obama spend millions of dollars in legal fees to keep people from seeing this real birth certificate? This makes absolutely no sense unless he does not have one to show.
By his refusal to produce a real US birth certificate the only logical conclusion is that he does not have one. Plus the clips from the video were he clearly says he was born in Kenya.
Thus if we are still following the rules and limitations set forth in the constitution, which unfortunately we seem to be discarding more and more everyday, then Obama is clearly occupying the office president illegally.
But now the real question is, who allowed this to occur in the first place and why is it allowed to continue? The answer to that I believe will show why our country is in the mess that it is.
BW, just for entertainment, here is the latest on the continuing sage of the Obama birth certificate.
Quote:
The latest development in the saga of the so-called "birther" challenges to Barack Obama’s presidency comes from Hawaii, Obama’s native state. Yesterday, Gov. Linda Lingle signed a law allowing state agencies to ignore requests for information if they determine the requests duplicate or are substantially similar to earlier ones. The law targets those who contend Obama wasn’t born in the U.S. and thus, under the Constitution, can’t be president; they still are sending 10 to 20 e-mails every week asking the state’s Health Department for verification of his birth certificate. Some file the same request even after receiving a response.
(As journalists, we wonder, "Since when has a government official needed a law to ignore a request for information?" But we assume Hawaii officials have their reasons.)
Hawaii officials tell requesters the same thing over and over: State law prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to anyone who doesn’t have a tangible interest in the matter. For those coming in late, Obama requested and obtained a copy of his own birth certificate and released it publicly in 2008, after which we examined it and found all in order. The document is legal proof of citizenship, and it’s the only type of birth record the state issues. Nevertheless, some wanted more. So Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the state health director, issued a statement saying that she has seen the original vital records verifying that Obama was born in Hawaii and "is a natural-born American citizen." But that hasn’t stopped the inquiries. http://www.factcheck.org/2010/05/the...pter-ccxcviii/
Wow. If this is true, there would have to be another election,
As we can see his handlers will not allow that. But as soon as he ceases to be an asset for them I have no doubt they would throw him to the wolfs without a second thought.
Quote:
That video is so spliced up, that one can hardly tell what is a lie and what is conjecture. Spin doctoring.
When Obama was standing up in front of multiple audiences and proclaims he was born in Kenya, that seems pretty clear to me.
Quote:
McCain was born it the Panama Canal Zone.
I have a problem with that also. I don’t believe either of them were valid candidates. Of course that didn’t matter to the people that controlled them.
However I have no problem with Hawaii refusing to produce someone’s birth certificate without first receiving that persons OK, as this is personal information. Although I find it hard to believe that someone would unwilling to reveal the type of “personal” information on their birth certificate.
Factcheck.org needs to recheck their facts because they are in error. But that is understandable when you find out that Factcheck is controlled by the democrats.
First off Hawaii does not have only one type of birth record, they have two.
One is a “certificate of live birth” it records the parents names and the date of birth. Anyone a citizen or not can receive one of these.
The other is a real “birth certificate” it records the parents names and date and time of birth. Plus the name of the attending doctor and the hospitals name and location.
So far Obama has only produced the Certificate of live birth. Since most people were/are unaware that Hawaii has two types of birth records they just assumed because Hawaii issued this certificate then he must have been born there. This is not a valid conclusion.
When Obama was standing up in front of multiple audiences and proclaims he was born in Kenya, that seems pretty clear to me.
Obama was a professor of Constitutional Law. Even if it were true, he would not dare say so in public. That was slimy camera magic. Like removing the word, not, for example.
Is snopes.org democratic too. Of course they won't let anyone copy their work, so you have to go there. Are both of Honolulu's major newspapers liars too. They posted the announcement of his birth along with others. Maybe they knew he would run for president. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama...ertificate.asp
Yes it is possible that clip might have been altered, as we don’t know where or when it was recorded. To accept it as absolute fact it would be nice to have multiple independent sources confirming it.
However this whole controversy would disappear over night if Obama would simply produce an official “birth certificate”. One that clearly states the location/hospital where he was born. Why has he not done this?
This argument is 2 years too late; FACT - Obama IS our President - deal with it!
This thread is about breaking the law. Do you think everyone who broke the law 2 years ago should be forgiven and given a free pass? Is there a statute of limitations on presidential lies?
This thread is about breaking the law. Do you think everyone who broke the law 2 years ago should be forgiven and given a free pass? Is there a statute of limitations on presidential lies?
I would say no, but then I'm probably in the minority.
In any case it is probably a mote point as I doubt that many of our legislators have ever read our constitution and those that have are baffled by the meaning of complex phrases like "congress shall make no laws---".
We have an excellent constitution now if we could only get our politicians to follow its rules and limitations.
This is the way I look at it...If Obama was not born in the US, at least his term is over in 2 years...unless the blinded population is as big as it was last election...
Against law
Linear Mode
