Go Back   Natural Medicine Talk > Health > Cancer

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-21-2012, 08:37 AM
athletic dept's Avatar
athletic dept athletic dept is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 342
athletic dept will become famous soon enough
Default Gerson controversy

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, May 21, 2012
Censorship, Sports and the Power of One Word

Editorial by Howard Straus

(OMNS May 21, 2012) At the World Snooker Championships, one of the finalists, Peter Ebdon, who had qualified for the Snooker Championship finals an amazing 21 times in a row, was asked to remove a logo from his tee shirt.

Anyone who watches almost any sport at all is certainly familiar with the blizzard of brand name logos for everything from banks to watches, from lubricants to cigarettes, from pain relief medications and golf paraphernalia to the naming of stadia. The commercialization of virtually every sport in this fashion is virtually a "given," no matter how harmful or carcinogenic a product may be, to the extent that it is a multi-billion-dollar a year industry in itself, with star sports figures earning millions of dollars in product endorsements.

But Peter Ebdon raised a firestorm by wearing a logo that said, "Gerson Therapy." Interestingly, few of the photographs of Ebdon in any of the articles clearly showed the logo. Ebdon was moved to wear the logo after his father's death from cancer. But the explosion from the cancer, pharmaceutical and medical industry was prompt. "World Snooker received several messages questioning whether he should be allowed to wear the Gerson Therapy logo," noted the Telegraph newspaper article.

"Obviously, I've upset somebody somewhere, but personally, I think it's too important for people not to know," said Ebdon, in a post-competition press conference. World Snooker officials clearly disagree, justifying their censorship by pointing to a rarely-enforced 1939 law prohibiting the advertising of any cancer therapy, or virtually any public speech about it. This law is never invoked when white-coated oncologists touting toxic chemotherapy or other ineffective [3] but immensely profitable allopathic cancer treatments take to the airwaves. In a very personal endorsement of Gerson Therapy principles, Ebdon has become a vegan since his father's death.

It is impossible to avoid the parallels to another, similar case. In 2004, when HRH Prince Charles mentioned the word Gerson once in one speech at the Royal College of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the medical and pharmaceutical industry in the UK pilloried him in the tabloid press for months. The Prince had said: "I know of one patient who turned to Gerson Therapy having been told she was suffering from terminal cancer and would not survive another course of chemotherapy. Happily, seven years later, she is alive and well. So it is vital that, rather than dismissing such experiences, we should further investigate the beneficial nature of these treatments." It is not exactly a wild-eyed statement.

Yet attacks on Prince Charles went so far as to imply that the Prince was crazy and lament that royals could no longer be beheaded. The tabloids picked up the story, and ran with it around the world. It was only when they realized that they were exposing the name Gerson to millions of people who would have otherwise never heard of it that they finally went silent.
Now, once again, the name Gerson, put forth publicly by one person, on one occasion, has given the medical/pharmaceutical industry apoplexy, and generated tens of thousands of words of calumny in the controlled press. Many people must be wondering what generated that kind of reaction. This "over-the-top" response is the greatest acknowledgement that the word Gerson clearly generates such fear in the medicine-for-profit industry that its knee-jerk reaction is to spew abuse in all directions.

The pharmaceutical industry is the most profitable business on the face of the planet. Yet it is terrified of one word, whether spoken by a prince or worn by a snooker player. If they have to resort to silencing even the quietest whisper of dissent, they are exposing their lack of confidence in their own competitiveness as providers of methods and products that are supposed to enhance and restore good health.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 09:21 AM
liverock's Avatar
liverock liverock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Out of sight
Posts: 1,535
Blog Entries: 1
liverock is a glorious beacon of lightliverock is a glorious beacon of lightliverock is a glorious beacon of lightliverock is a glorious beacon of lightliverock is a glorious beacon of light

If it the logo had been for "Veet Hair Removal Creme For Men" the ban would have been more understandable.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2012, 03:37 PM
Arrowwind09's Avatar
Arrowwind09 Arrowwind09 is offline
Standing at the Portal
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,550
Arrowwind09 has a spectacular aura aboutArrowwind09 has a spectacular aura about

What a great idea. Maybe Its Time to do more advertising for Gerson. I might get one an wear it to a run for the cure event.

"Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth." Marcus Aurelius
Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 10:18 PM
Thrasymachus Thrasymachus is offline
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dover, NJ
Posts: 220
Thrasymachus will become famous soon enough

Originally Posted by Arrowwind09 View Post
I might get one an wear it to a run for the cure event.[/COLOR]
That is an oxymoron. "Run for the cure" events fund the Pharmaceutical industries which get so rich off losing "war on cancer", but bilking people in the meantime who have cancer before they manage to die.

But as the Gerson Therapy shows the solution is as simple as not eating meat. However there is no money in advocating that.
Reply With Quote
Please reply to this thread with any new information or opinions.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gerson Therapy, your opinion please? sydneynsw Cancer 12 04-16-2013 07:24 PM
Gerson - Why apple and carrot juice? will dc Cancer 12 03-15-2013 10:52 AM
Flu Shot Controversy kind2creatures Colds, Flu & Fever 3 11-07-2011 10:53 AM
Lyme Controversy u&iraok Other Diseases 2 08-07-2009 07:24 AM
Amalgam controversy barry1817 Dentistry 1 04-13-2006 11:47 PM